I love engaging with the brand on Twitter, but do I have to know the person behind the curtain?

[Warren Sukernek]

A very provocative post on Mashable today in which Mark Drapeau shares his thoughts about brands on Twitter. Mark thinks that brands should not be on Twitter, but that people ‘hide’ behind organizational brands, obscuring their persona and therefore reducing authenticity and transparency. Yes, it’s a subject that has been discussed many times. I’ve written about brands on Twitter and best practices many times. And of course, there was the survey that Peter Sorgenfrei and I ran in which 240 Twitter users were asked to give their perceptions on brands. Once again, three key points:

• Not surprisingly, most users (89%) agree that brands should engage their customers on Twitter.The majority also have a better impression of brands that use Twitter for customer service (81%).
• Proper usage of Twitter however, is paramount as almost 90% of users would frown upon poor or inappropriate brand use of Twitter.
• The power of a relationship is extremely strong on Twitter. 60% of respondents would recommend a company based on their presence on Twitter and 80% of Twitter users will reward those brands they have key relationships by being more willing to purchase from them.

And you can find over 50 brands using Twitter on a Social Media Marketing wiki that Peter Kim is curating.

Over 70 people have commented on Mashable today and the predominant opinion is that we like our brands on Twitter. Since Twitter is an opt-in community, I can choose to follow whoever or whatever brand I want. I was particularly impressed with Pete Blackshaw’s (author of Angry Customers tell 3000) comment, paraphrased here, Part of what’s drawn brands to Twitter has been the very enthusiastic reception of Twitterites (tens of thousands of them) who have been preaching company and brand “engagement” and “responsiveness” and “participation.” If anything, the Twitter crowd has flirted with righteousness in encouraging brands to participate.

Christine Perkett of Perkett PR says in her Mashable comment,

I think this is an interesting debate and - like anything - comes down to personal preference. That’s why I actually love Twitter - I can choose to follow, unfollow or even just save a certain brand’s “Tweet” that I want to remember.

Obviously as a marketer - and one of the brands on Twitter (in addition to the numerous clients that we’ve helped kick start on Twitter) - I am a fan of such. However, I think more specifically, I am a fan of brands doing it right. And by that I mean - engaging and being personable as you suggest. Not just using Twitter as an RSS feed. Not just blasting your own news/agenda. Combining industry insights with opinions and news and, when warranted, even humor. And, identifying who is behind the corporate handle.

Felix Leander of Burson-Marsteller, also gives a similar perspective on his excellent PR/ Social media blog.

Does anyone disagree that brands should be on Twitter, but there is certainly a right way on how to do it? How would you help a brand to understand Twitter and do it right?

Originally posted on Twittermaven.

[Warren Sukernek]

Vincent, thanks for the comment. A lot of spirited discussion this weekend around brands and their Twitter activities. Have you seen the criticism and debate on Chris Brogan's blog?

[Vincent Wright]

I think brands should be on Twitter every bit as much as brands should be on Google.

I think brands should be on Twitter every bit as much as brands should use computers.

Twitter is a multi-purpose tool - a tool capable of helping both individuals - AND - brands...

Anyone trying to force Twitter to be less than a multi-purpose tool capable of being used by individuals *and* brands perhaps could use their time to find something better to do...

Thanks, and Keep STRONG, Warren!!
Vincent Wright